The Constitutional Rupture
With the federal charter suspended and two provinces claiming the same seabed, the cabinet must decide whether Meridia survives as a single state. The legal questions — who owns a discovery in disputed internal waters, whether a suspended charter still binds — collide with the political ones, and the longer the cabinet debates, the more facts the provinces create on the ground.
Sub-questions
- Can the federation hold — through a new revenue-sharing settlement, a constitutional convention, or federal force — and at what cost to which province?
- Who holds legitimate authority while the charter is suspended: the President, the federal legislature, or the provincial assemblies?
- How should the rare-earth wealth be governed so that it stabilizes the union rather than detonates it?
Starter Resources
- Background Guide — The Meridian Charter (fictional) — the suspended constitution and the provincial bargain HTSMUN VI
- Crisis Dossier — The Meridian Shelf Survey (fictional) — what the survey found, and where HTSMUN VI
- Real-world parallel: federal resource disputes — Nigeria, Iraq, and the politics of who owns the ground chair’s brief